This is the most significant crisis that this consultancy has seen in our last three decades. The surge in illness, the outbreaks legal and business ramifications are critical and undeterminable. Government and industries are desperately trying to understand the challenge, support victims and their families, and find a solution.
The
problem is, the more the world enters lock-down and isolation, the harder it is
to effectively confirm risk and the human and technical resources available.
Most of the renowned immunologists are cautiously optimistic. Putting a time on
this, however, is virtually impossible. Most businesses are investing in
virtual technology, improved infrastructure and future stability of the
workforce. Our virtual crisis scenario testing and training is working well as
we continue face-to-face contact with crisis and incident response teams.
Prepared
executive management is communicating constantly through video-conferences and
regular bulletins. In fact, some businesses have set up broadcast studios in
home and office to ensure that all employees are communicated with to understand the new and changing
operating models.
Harvard
epidemiologist, Professor Mark Lipsitch, made the concerning point on the
outbreak as it continues to spread, when he said, “I think the likely outcome
is that it will ultimately not be containable”. We are in the middle
of the containment process and there are good and bad examples of this around
the world.
I
see Singapore as a shining example of proactive and immediate response. Like
many Australian businesses, Singapore had a plan before the virus came. Most
of Asia had plans because of their past experience with SARS and other
epidemics. In Singapore, the ABC reported that testing regimes were
up and running by the time the first case was confirmed on January 23rd.
“Labs were in place for our first case”, said Dale Fisher, an Australian
infectious disease expert working with the Singapore Government on its strategy. “And
soon after our first case, every lab in every public hospital, was capable of
doing tests,” Professor Fisher said. “So, we ramped up very quickly.” Within
days of the first case, temperature checks were happening at Changi Airport for
incoming passengers. This is in contrast to Australia where
passengers arriving recently at Sydney Airport were complaining there were
still no mandatory temperature checks for incoming passengers.
A
key lesson can be learnt from this crisis so far - the internationalisation of
the corona-virus. What was completely unusual about this event was the fact that
even though the disease had been discovered, the escalation was confusingly
slow at first. Media and public opinion did not focus on the possibility of the
battle to control COVID-19. At the beginning of its spread, some
containment measures were discussed in the background but the thought of widely
banning travel, closing down cities and hoarding resources, was not even a
consideration.
The
global authorities, the World Health Organisation and the United States Centres
for Disease Control, were somewhat confusing through the escalation phases.
Their process lacked the recognition of the rising international threat. There was
also confusion over the causes of the crisis in China.
Another
lesson was the question of leadership communication in every country. National
leaders had different approaches to the problem. Their press conferences lacked
continuity of universal information. Public confidence was severely undermined.
This has been particularly relevant in the US. To quote President
Trump in late March: “We’re opening up this
incredible country. Because we have to do that. I would love to have it open by
Easter. I would love to have that. It’s such an important day for
other reasons, but I’d love to make it an important day for this. I would love
to have the country opened up, and rarin’ to go by Easter.” Very little
consideration of the worst-case scenario. The response from Dr. Tina Tan of the
Infectious Diseases Society of America was - "This is the making of a
major public health disaster. I am not sure where he is getting his information
from but it is extremely flawed."
Leadership
hubris has a problem of underestimation – the tendency to plan for the easiest
public option – the most logical way out. A common statement of underestimation
during the Second World War was “we’ll all be home for Christmas”.
The
central crisis management responses needed in this continually unfolding crisis
are:
- Determining your organisation’s preparedness.
- Constantly work-shopping a broader set of disruptive scenarios.
- Reviewing the human and technical resources needed to respond.
- Become the central point of leadership communication.
- Assessing the needs of your stakeholders: people, customers, suppliers and others.
- Ensuring the continuity of critical processes.
- Continually assess investment strategies.
- Date & privacy considerations
- Reviewing control of supply chains.
- Preparing ahead for recovery and growth.
In
terms of crisis management for small or large businesses, it will be a case of
riding out the months, and maybe years, of managing the huge number of new
risks. As Dr. Edward de Bono, international author international lateral
thinker, said “the key responsibility as a Risk Manager and Team Leader
is the ability to generate viable risk-adverse alternatives and ways of doing
business that minimise your company’s operational risk.”
Crisis
management during the COVID-19 outbreak needs a refreshed playbook because this
virus is a historic challenge to contain and recover.
Do you think you could have been more prepared?
Do you think you could have been more prepared?